Government attempts to slow a rapidly rising prison population by a reformed, and credible, community sentences framework has largely failed. That is according to a new report published on March 3 by the Centre for Crime and Justice Studies at King’s College London. It’ll be discussed at an invite-only seminar on March 10.
The report speaks of evidence that the Community Orders and Suspended Sentence Orders, which came into effect in April 2005, are contributing to the rise in prison numbers, rather than helping to arrest its growth.<br><br>The report – The Community Order and the Suspended Sentence Order three years on – independently assesses the impact of the Community Order and Suspended Sentence Order three years on from their implementation. Its findings are based on analysis of government statistics about the use of the two orders and interviews with 25 probation staff and 16 people subject to the orders.<br><br>Some of the report’s findings <br><br>There was a fifteen-fold increase in the use of the Suspended Sentence Order in its first year and a twenty four-fold increase in the three years to 2008. Half of all Suspended Sentence Orders handed out in the magistrates’ courts are for the less serious `summary’ offences, suggesting that the Orders are being used too often and inappropriately.<br><br>Both the Community Order and the Suspended Sentence Order appear to be getting tougher and more punitive. Use of unpaid work and curfews has been growing. Both unpaid work and curfew requirements share punishment as a main sentencing purpose, suggesting an increased resort to more punitive requirements.<br><br>There is no evidence that the Community Order or Suspended Sentence Order are reducing the use of short-term custodial sentences or tackling `uptariffing’. The prison population has continued to grow alongside the increasing use of the two Orders. There is evidence that the sentences are displacing fines, rather than prison.<br><br>Helen Mills, research and policy associate at the Centre for Crime and Justice Studies at King’s College London and co-author of the report said: `In their ongoing drive for effective management the government maybe undermining a style of work that was valued by those probation officers and people on orders we spoke to.'<br><br>Richard Garside, director of the Centre for Crime and Justice Studies at King’s College London said: `Most people would no doubt prefer a spell of community service to six months in Holloway or Wormwood Scrubs. But the current community sentencing framework appears to be contributing to ongoing prison expansion, not slowing or reversing its growth. The question is, are community sentences part of the solution, or are they part of the problem?’ <br><br>Notes <br><br>The Community Order and the Suspended Sentence Order became available to the courts in England and Wales on 4 April 2005. The Community Order replaced the various community sentences that had been available previously, which had developed in a somewhat haphazard fashion during the preceding 100 years: the Community Rehabilitation Order, the Community Punishment Order, the Community Punishment and Rehabilitation Order, the Drug Treatment and Testing Order, the Curfew Order and the Attendance Centre Order. The Suspended Sentence Order represents a revival of the old-style suspended sentence, which had virtually fallen into disuse. The authors are Professor George Mair of Liverpool John Moores University and Helen Mills, research and policy associate at the Centre for Crime and Justice Studies. The research was supported by a grant from the Esmée Fairbairn Foundation. The report can be downloaded –
