Bribery vetting

by Mark Rowe

Only half of British businesses vet their suppliers for UK Bribery Act compliance, according to an audit firm.

The Fraud Investigation and Dispute Services team at Ernst & Young has released research suggesting that nearly half (48pc) of British firms are failing to vet their suppliers for compliance with the UK Bribery Act, and that only 6pc would re-tender, if they discovered their suppliers were not compliant.

The study polled procurement managers and directors from a wide range of firms across the UK. The study found that while midmarket firms are often less likely to have robust processes and systems in place to counter bribery risk, companies at both ends of the spectrum appeared complacent when it came to vetting their suppliers for compliance with the Act.
Ernst & Young’s study found that even though 60pc of firms with a turnover of £5m to £50m vet their suppliers to assess whether their business practices comply with UK Bribery Act, 16pc of these midmarket firms would ‘do nothing’ if their suppliers fail to comply. Moreover, amongst those firms that do not currently vet their suppliers, 60pc reported that they are not planning to implement any anti-bribery programmes in the future.
The research also suggested that only 40pc of larger firms (those with a turnover of more than £50 million) would remove suppliers from their supply chain if they fail to comply with the Act.

John Smart, Partner at Ernst & Young said: “Following recent concerns over food contamination, there has been much focus on supply chains and how much companies know about suppliers and agents acting on their behalf. In cases where bribery and corruption are discovered, the consequences for companies under the law may be serious. It’s worrying to see that businesses are failing to make sure that their suppliers are complying with the UK Bribery Act, especially as the Act came into effect over a year and a half ago. Many directors are still unaware that they can be held personally accountable for any failings in this area. This means that senior managers and directors risk significant prison terms and large fines for non-compliance in which they are personally involved, even if the breach is caused by the actions of a third-party supplier.” Other findings:

24 per cent of firms believe that taking on a new supplier will incur the most risk to supply chains;
Not quite half, 48pc, of firms carry out third- party due diligence in their supply chain;
one in eight, 12pc of firms would ‘do nothing’ if they found out that their suppliers failed to comply with the Act;
Less than half (44pc) of firms with a turnover from £5m to £50m carry out third party due diligence.

John Smart added: “Many businesses are underestimating the reach of the UK Bribery Act. Our findings reveal that there is still a lot of work to be done in this area to ensure that directors and senior managers not only realise the importance of complying with the Act, but also are willing to examine whether their entire supply chain is meeting these same standards. Anyone who thinks that the issue of third-party compliance can simply be glossed over is making a grave mistake, as failures in this area can lead to significant fines and penalties for all involved.”

Related News


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter to stay on top of security news and events.

© 2024 Professional Security Magazine. All rights reserved.

Website by MSEC Marketing