Crimes and anti-social behaviour that damage England’s historic environment will it’s hoped for the first time be tackled in a much more coordinated way by a new initiative launched by English Heritage.
Under the strategic guidance of English Heritage, the police via the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) and the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), a nationwide network is developing among enforcement bodies, local authorities, non-governmental organisations, professional groups and amenity societies. Their aim; to tackle and reduce offences such as architectural theft, including metal theft, criminal damage, illegal metal detecting, graffiti (giving the case of Clifford’s Tower, York, a 13th century keep atop William the Conqueror’s fortress sprayed with graffiti in 2010), vehicle nuisance and arson. <br><br>Representatives from more than 40 organisations, ranging from The National Trust, The Church of England, Crime Stoppers and Ministry of Defence to National Parks, The Woodland Trust and The Historic Houses Association met for the first time on February 11 to discuss the formation of the Alliance to Reduce Crime against Heritage (ARCH). ARCH is a voluntary national network.<br>A memorandum of understanding to delineate responsibilities between the three strategic partners – English Heritage, ACPO and CPS – will be signed at the event. Local authorities will be encouraged to join the coordinated effort. Canterbury City Council is the first authority also to have agreed to sign the memorandum.<br>Local history societies, amenity groups, neighbourhood watch and residents associations will be encouraged to raise awareness of the risk of criminal damage to historic sites and buildings in their area. The model of Neighbourhood Policing, established to tackle the crime and day-to-day anti-social behaviours most affecting local neighbourhoods, provides a model for tackling heritage crimes, it’s claimed. Local communities are urged to understand the heritage assets in their area that may be at risk of irreversible damage from crime, and to report suspicious behaviour to their neighbourhood policing teams.<br>The profile and accountability of heritage crimes among police officers will also increase. For the first time, there will be a national lead in ACPO on heritage crimes and there will also be a dedicated portfolio holder in many police forces across the country.<br>Neighbourhood Policing and community involvement is expected to contribute considerably to improved intelligence and data on the ground; both are lacking according to the heritage body.<br><br>Extent <br><br>English Heritage says the true extent of heritage crime is difficult to ascertain due to the way in which it is recorded and the fact it tends to be under-reported by victims. This initiative seeks to address the reluctance to report such crimes by increasing public awareness and placing the emphasis on a coordinated effort. <br>The 2009 English Heritage study of illegal metal detecting suggested that the problem is growing and reported cases are only the tip of the iceberg. Metal theft from churches is also a serious issue, with the number of insurance claims in 2010 being 20 times as many as that in 2005. In 2010 the first national assessment was conducted looking at existing information and disparate data that various organisations were able to supply, including: English Heritage’s Heritage At Risk Register; live known cases; geographical information on the spread and concentration of heritage assets; the 2009 study on illegal metal detecting; and, church metal theft data. This identified that arson, architectural theft (including metal theft), removal of artefacts from protected sites and vehicle nuisance pose the greatest threat.<br>Lincolnshire and the Peak District National Park, East of England, the South East and the South West have been identified as pilot areas because of the presence of many vulnerable historic sites and the enthusiasm of local partners.<br>In the next 12 months or so, the heritage crime initiative will focus on the prevention and detection of four broad types of crime:<br><br>Damage caused to the historic environment – This refers to physical damage (as a result of fire, graffiti, vandalism and damage caused by cars, motorcycles and other means).<br>Unlawful excavation and removal of articles from the historic environment – This refers to theft from scheduled monuments or protected wrecks and includes illegal metal detecting.<br>Architectural theft – This refers to theft of items from historic buildings and structures like stone walls, vintage street signs and pavements. In recent years a new trend has emerged in the theft of lead and metal from roofs and guttering.<br>Unlawful alteration and demolition of listed buildings<br><br>Baroness Andrews, Chair of English Heritage, said: "Heritage crime robs us of our history. Its effect on our lives is insidious and felt often too late. Beautiful buildings are scarred forever, places we treasure and enjoy lose their identity and appeal, evidence about our past is lost and tourism suffers, not to mention the burden on owners to repair and put things right. Society needs to work together to combat these criminal activities."<br><br>Richard Crompton, Chief Constable of Lincolnshire and the ACPO national lead for heritage crimes, said: "This is a really important step which will have a significant impact upon the problem of crime and anti-social behaviour in and around our historic environment. A great many people care deeply about this sort of crime and I believe that we can tap into that concern and interest and work with communities to make a real difference." Nick Hunt Director of Strategy and Policy at the Crown Prosecution Service, said: "I was very pleased that English Heritage invited the Crown Prosecution Service to become a party to this memorandum. It should lead to much better working between English Heritage and its different partners including the CPS. We view heritage crime seriously and those who commit such crime should be aware that the CPS will prosecute if there is sufficient evidence for a realistic prospect of conviction and it is in the public interest." Chief Inspector Mark Harrison, seconded from Kent Police in March 2010 to act as Policing Advisor for English Heritage to improve heritage crime prevention and law enforcement in England, said: "Good progress has been made in establishing coordinated working relations between the enforcement agencies and setting priorities at a national level, but the most important part of the initiative is the engagement of communities across the country in establishing their own local networks. A real difference will only follow if this galvanises local action." Among other things proposed is to develop a central data recording system that supports accurate and consistent recording of incidents, crimes and prosecution cases; and create an information exchange protocol between enforcement agencies and other relevant bodies.
