The civil liberties body Liberty has published its report on the policing of the TUC March for the Alternative. The human rights group concluded that the official demonstration was overwhelmingly peaceful, and that the Metropolitan Police’s response was on the whole proportionate.
Assistant Commissioner Lynne Owens, said: "I welcome the Liberty report which follows us proactively offering to open the policing operation of the TUC march to the scrutiny of their legal observers.
"As it makes clear, we were faced with the difficult task of striking the right balance between ensuring the vast majority of people were able to peacefully protest whilst managing the small number of criminals intent on disorder. We had officers along the whole route who could move in quickly, as the report recognises we did, to manage local break outs of disorder.
"In what was a significant and challenging policing operation we welcome Liberty’s overall conclusion that the policing was proportionate."
However, Liberty’s concern with the police’s constant focus on the practice of ‘kettling’ remains.<br><br>At the invitation of both the TUC and the Metropolitan Police, Liberty provided around 130 legal observers for the protest on 26 March 2011, including two in the force’s Special Operations Room. Pairs of observers were stationed at 35 fixed points, and around 50 moved with sections of the march. <br><br>Given the volume of protesters and the number of police officers involved, Liberty was impressed by the generally peaceful nature of the protest. The report highlights the following:<br><br>- The principal criticism is the Metropolitan Police’s attitude towards kettling. It was clear to observers on the day that the fatally-flawed tactic was under near constant consideration, and there appeared to be a continual expectation that a containment would be imposed at some point. Kettling is a blunt, resource-heavy and logistically difficult tactic and it is difficult to understand why it has become such a favoured option when policing protest. <br><br>- There were frequent problems with the communications technology between the Special Operations Room, Bronze commanders and police officers on the ground, which often led to confusion. Radios did not work effectively, and officers had to resort to using mobile phones. <br><br>- Placards bearing swear words were confiscated and protesters’ personal details were taken by police – possibly with the public order offence of causing harassment, alarm or distress in mind. The inclusion of expletives on a placard alone does not constitute such an offence and Liberty questions whether the police had lawful grounds for such actions. <br><br>Shami Chakrabarti, Director of Liberty, said: “As people the world over struggle for basic freedoms, the March for the Alternative was for the most part, a real example of good-natured, well-organised and proportionately policed protest. But the preoccupation with “kettling” and political pressure for knee-jerk public order powers continue to threaten the right to peaceful dissent in the oldest unbroken democracy.” <br><br>Contrary to political and media pundits, Liberty observed no evidence of a need for additional police powers. Liberty’s legal observation extended to the Metropolitan Police’s planning for the TUC demonstration, the policing of the official march itself and the rally in Hyde Park.<br><br>For a link to the full, 15-page report –
