TESTIMONIALS

“Received the latest edition of Professional Security Magazine, once again a very enjoyable magazine to read, interesting content keeps me reading from front to back. Keep up the good work on such an informative magazine.”

Graham Penn
ALL TESTIMONIALS
FIND A BUSINESS

Would you like your business to be added to this list?

ADD LISTING
FEATURED COMPANY
Case Studies

Workplace surveillance study

by Mark Rowe

Workplace surveillance has expanded rapidly in recent years, but the law hasn’t kept up. That’s according to a think-tank’s study. The Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) says that employees in roles with low autonomy, low skill levels, and without union representation are at a higher risk of being monitored using intrusive technologies. A typical sector is retail. Black workers may be at greater risk of being surveilled than other ethnic groups, as they are more likely to be in low-autonomy (26 per cent) and low-skill (42 per cent) roles, while 73 per cent are not members of a trade union.

Younger workers (16-29), and people still working over the age of 60, are also more likely than workers aged 30 to 59 to be employed in these kinds of roles. This unequal exposure to workplace surveillance risks exacerbating inequalities in the UK labour market, infringing on workers’ rights and undermining well-being, the report suggests.

Tech is enabling widespread and increasingly intrusive surveillance of UK workers, often without their input or consent. Such tech includes facial recognition, biometric tracking, and tools that monitor keystrokes or even workers’ emotional states. IPPR is calling on UK Government to introduce new legislation that gives workers a voice over how they are monitored at work, and to expand protections to include algorithmic management systems – which increasingly automate performance reviews, shift allocations, and even disciplinary action. The think-tank proposes:

New legal rights to consultation, modelled on redundancy law, ensuring workers are consulted before surveillance technologies are introduced;
Surveillance added as a statutory subject of collective bargaining, empowering unions to negotiate on this growing area of concern;
Information transparency requirements, compelling employers to disclose what data is collected, why, and how it will be used;
and enforcement mechanisms, including tribunal access and financial penalties for employers that breach new duties.

Joseph Evans, IPPR researcher and co-author of the report, said: “Workplace surveillance has expanded rapidly in recent years, but the law hasn’t kept up. Black workers are more likely to be in jobs where there’s a higher risk of intrusive surveillance. Without urgent reform, new technologies may deepen the inequalities already baked into the labour market. We need new rights that ensure all workers – especially those most at risk – have a say over how they’re monitored and managed.

“The Government’s pledge to introduce negotiation rights is welcome. Ministers should legislate for these rights as soon as possible as part of wider upgrades to workers’ rights. People urgently need a real voice over how they’re monitored and managed at work.”

Read more

The IPPR paper Negotiating the future of work: Legislating to protect workers from surveillance, by Joe Atkinson and Joseph Evans. More at https://www.ippr.org/articles/negotiating-the-future-of-work-surveillance.

Related News